[APWSLMembers 896] The Toyota related news NO.41
tomoo banno
to-mo.v326 at angel.ocn.ne.jp
Tue Jun 12 23:37:50 JST 2012
<The Toyota related news>NO.41
Incidents in May <2012.6.13>
from APWSL・Aichi Group
※:Abbreviations used:
ATU=All Toyota Union
ATU・S=citizens group supporting ATU
TMWU=Toyota Motor Workers’ Union
TMPCWA= Toyota Motor Philippines Corporation Workers Association
APWSL=Asian Pacific Workers Solidarity Links.
JAWN=Japan Automobile Workers Network
L&HNWNM=Living and Health Network for workers in Nishi-Mikawa area
Unfair decision to restricts union activities
The following decision was announced by the court about the reported labor
dispute at the "Restaurant Kasumi" in Tsushima city, Aichi.
Requested by Nepalese husband and wife who are cook of this restaurant,
about wages arrears, confinement, etc., struggle under cooperation of unions
of the area began from about one year before. The struggle has been
developed through various methods and ideas like overnight stay, protesting
sit-in, street advertisement, door-to-door distribution of fliers etc.
However, "provisional disposition statements, such as a ban on propaganda
activity," was raised from the management side in the last autumn, and the
determination was announced by the Nagoya District Court on June 4.
According to that, all the above-mentioned activities within 200 meters in
radius from a base are forbidden. It is unacceptable contents for us
infringing our "freedom of expression" and "freedom of speech", that anybody
who breached it will be imposed fine of 1 million yen a day.
Now, we are working on prudent measures with concerning supporters and
lawyers, because it is a court decision, even though it is unfair
determination.
(2) Mr. Yoshida of AKK presented a case to the court.
Mr. Yoshida of Aisin Kiko Co.Ltd (AKK) took the claim for damages in the
Nagoya District Court on 24th. Mr. Yoshida's trial turned into two trials,
"claim for cancellation of decision not to pay industrial injury insurance
for him" against the country government, and "claim for withdrawal of
dismissal" to a company.
The reason of the claim is that the defendant discharged the plaintiff on
November 5, 2011, for natural retirement treatment noting that the
leave-of-absence period completed, although the plaintiff was still
receiving medical treatment due to injury during working. This lawsuit is to
request for decision of invalidity of the above mentioned dismissal, and
asking for recognition of the status as workers of a plaintiff, requesting
for the payment of reparations for default on an obligation and illegal
behaviors.
After submitting a complaint, we had an interview with supporters at the
judicial club.
A representative lawyer Mr. Nakatani, explained about the lawsuit. And Mr.
Wakatsuki, chairman of the All Toyota labor unions (ATU) appealed that they
tried to solve the problem through collective bargaining, but defendant side
became stubborn and did not show the posture to respond, so it resulted in
this circumstances.
Finally, plaintiff Mr. Yoshida mentioned his wish that he wants to win in
the trial, and return to the work place for his friends, because he has a
lot of things to do there.
(1) Struggle of Mr. Kumazawa of Fine-sinter.
There was a trial to request withdrawal of dismissal for Mr. Kumazawa
(previously a member of ATU, currently a member of JMIU)of Fine-sinter
Co.,Ltd at the Nagoya District Court on 14th. It became clear that the
company dismissed Mr. Kumazawa unfairly to separate him from union
activities, exaggerating his portable phone mail as if "used privately
during working time."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://misc.labornetjp.org/pipermail/apwslmembers/attachments/20120612/11619729/attachment.htm
More information about the APWSLMembers
mailing list